Saturday, December 1, 2012

Hottest Android news and rumors for the week ending Nov. 30


The most disturbing thing about online shopping, to me, has always been just how easy it is. A couple of clicks, a brief glance at a credit card number, and bang -- there's an order of chicken wings on the way to your door. It's too easy, frankly, as my bank account balance and expanding waistline can attest.
Which is why Google is to be commended for making the process much more harrowing, at least in the case of the Nexus 4. If you haven't heard, the initial production run apparently sold out in about five minutes, ticking off Android fans around the world who weren't quite quick enough on the trigger.
But then! Google apparently got everything sorted out and the Nexus 4 went back on sale as of Monday -- upon which the Play store began to produce weird error messages and behave erratically, swallowing shopping carts and generally making a nuisance out of itself.
Still, at least it's all ironed out now, right? Well, mostly -- the site appears to be working normally, but you'll still have to wait awhile until you get your hands on your Nexus 4. The 16GB version will ship in four to five weeks, according to the Play store, while the 8GB version will ship in eight or nine.
*
report from the China Commercial Times has touched off widespread speculation that Google is planning to absorb Chrome OS into Android. The report states that Google is readying a sub-13-inch touchscreen Chromebook, blurring the lines between laptops and tablets.
Although there's no direct evidence of Google's plans to merge Chrome OS and Android, some have pointed out that there's plenty of circumstantial evidence to suggest that this is, in fact, the case.
*
The Galaxy S 4 rumor mill continues to swirl, though the International Business Times is calling shenanigans on the whole "leaked specs" rumor.
Given the apparent fixation of the lower-level rumor sites on the Galaxy S 4, I'm a little surprised that there's no story making the rounds about the GS 4 being an injectable nano-device that lives in your bloodstream, because pretty much everything else is out there already. Some of the rumors might be right, but mostly by accident -- the only thing that looks remotely credible is the idea that it'll come out sometime early in 2013.
*
Data, data everywhere -- the news that the iPhone 5 had quickly removed the Galaxy S III from its place atop smartphone sales charts came early this week, surprising almost no one. According to one analyst firm, the Galaxy S III was briefly the top-selling smartphone in the world -- the first to dethrone the iPhone even briefly.
~~
While the iPhone is back on top, its bigger cousin might have more reason to sweat the competition, according to ABI Research, which released a report on Monday saying that Android devices are rapidly closing in on the iPad in the tablet market.
(Hat tip: TechCrunch)
*
Facebook is apparently encouraging employees to use Android devices instead of iPhones, in what TechCrunch is calling a DroidFooding campaign. If this prompts changes for the Android app, I'm all for it.
(Hat tip: TechCrunch, again)
Email Jon Gold at jgold@nww.com and follow him on Twitter at @NWWJonGold.
Read more about software in Network World's Software section.

Yahoo hit with $2.7 billion judgment by Mexico court


A court in Mexico has entered a US$2.7 billion judgment against Yahoo in a breach-of-contract suit over a yellow-pages listing service.
The 49th Civil Court of the Federal District of Mexico City issued the non-final judgment against Yahoo and Yahoo de Mexico in a case brought by Worldwide Directories and Ideas Interactivas, Yahoo announced on Friday. Yahoo said the plaintiffs' claims are without merit and it will appeal the judgment.
Worldwide Directories and Ideas Interactivas claimed breach of contract, breach of promise and lost profits in the case, which involved contracts related to a listing service.
Stephen Lawson covers mobile, storage and networking technologies for The IDG News Service. Follow Stephen on Twitter at @sdlawsonmedia. Stephen's e-mail address is stephen_lawson@idg.com

iPhone 6 rumor rollup for week ending Nov. 30


Cyber Monday, by Friday, is just a dim memory, and a dull ache caused by the absence of the NextiPhone.
The iOSphere grasped at patents, concept art, a June release date, and the towering genius of Saint Jonathan Ive to keep hope afloat for iPhone 6. Or 5S. Whatevah.
You read it here second.
__________
"The source of the rumors [about a summer 2013 release for the Next iPhone], Digitimes, has an extremely mixed track record when it comes to Apple news, so the iPhone 5S release date at this point is still firmly entrenched in the shadows. However, as we pointed out, that doesn't mean that the iPhone 5S won't be released in the summer."     -- Adam Mills, GottaBeMobile, as in most iOSphere rumors, covering all the bases, going around in circles, and ending up where one started, none the wiser.
__________
iPhone 6 will use cool Apple patents we've seen before
If you haven't seen a good rumor lately, invent your own. And that's what "Invention Girl" did at InventHelp.com, a Pittsburgh company that bills itself as "America's largest inventor service firm."
The blog post, "What Will a Future iPhone Look Like?" draws its inspiration from the cheerleading posts about Apple patent applications and awards at PatentlyApple.com, which has rarely met an Apple patent it didn't love. Invention Girl took a handful of the inventions highlighted at Patently Apple and then created photorealistic illustrations to show what a future iPhone will look like.
"Apple will either have to add something truly innovative to the iPhone or accept a slowly shrinking market, courtesy of Android," she writes. "We've combed through Patently Apple and have come up with 4 ways Apple may regain the iPhone magic by illustrating some of the more innovative iPhone patents. Whether or not the patents make it into an iPhone is anybody's guess. Regardless, it's fun to see what the iPhone may look like based on filed patents rather than tech pundit speculation ..."
Who could argue with "fun"? But it's an idea that sounds better than it actually plays out.
The first illustrated invention is the "projector phone." It shows a foreground closeup of an otherwise unremarkable iPhone lying on a wood surface, emitting rays of light from a built-in mini-projector to create a humongous projected image on a living room wall. It may not actually be fun but it certainly looks odd: as if the iPhone had been inflated to the size of a coffee table; and the image it projects actually seems smaller than the phone's apparent size.
Doubtless it's picking a nit to grouse that Invention Girl is "showing" a feature of a future iPhone, not the future iPhone itself. But that's what we do here.
She partly redeems herself with the rendering of the "smart bezel" invention, which Patently Apple covered in 2011. To make a long post short, the invention calls for using the front "bezel" -- the part of the phone's front surface that borders the actual display -- and making this active, so it can respond to touch. Moving these touches and gestures off the main display leaves more space there for showing Web pages, videos, etc.
In the illustration, a large-screen iPhone, with very thin side bezels, shows a text from an HTML Web page: the actual browser controls are shown to the left and right of the home button, as part of the smart or active bezel.
The two other inventions are a "smart hybrid display that could switch between a standard LCD and an e-Paper display"; and a "transparent" phone, meaning that part or all of the display could become, you know, transparent.
For the iOSphere's rumoristas, this probably does count as fun. Given the archive of Patently Apple Apple patent posts, Invention Girl could keep this going for the next couple of years.
iPhone 6 better be ... better. Or else
Storm clouds are gathering in the iOSphere as witnessed in this recent forum thread, which became increasing bitter and vituperative at MacRumors.com.
A forum member named Ramius kicked it off on Tuesday, Nov. 27, by asking the apparently straight-forward question, "Is [iPhone 6] coming next October? Judging by the release history of the previous iPhones, this seems to be quite true."
But he couldn't leave it at that. "I still use my 3GS, and was planning on updating to iPhone 5. But the design struck me as very boring and too similiar [sic] to the 4S. I also hear people can scrape it up quite easy. And with the red flare problem on the camera, it is less and less tempting to buy. The biggest problem for me, is that it just did not provide a big enough change. It just seemed "a little bit better in some ways", but not really going the full distance of proving itself a new champion."
Some commenters stuck with the original question. Jessica noted, "No one knows but based on historic data, October 2013 sounds about right." The "historic data" refers to the fact that the last two iPhones were announced in the fall, rather than early summer.
Tyler struck a confident note, predicting not only the time frame, but the level of innovation in the next iPhone. "There will most likely be an iPhone 5S next October, which will improve the internal specs of the phone, but the look is likely to be the exact same or nearly the same as the 5," he posted. "If you are waiting for a re-designed iPhone, you'll likely be waiting at least two years, and that's assuming the 6 deviates from the form factor of the 5."
Another, maflynn, made what proved to be a vain plea: "At this point lets not get into the 5s vs 6 in the naming of the iPhone. The next update (regardless of what it may be called) is probably due out next fall."
Ramius upped the ante: "They are increasingly failing to generate hype," he wrote. "And if they don't break their pattern, they will not be impressive anymore. So for Apple to succeed, they must show new innovation, and stop milking their old designs and ideas. Apple should know this. And if they are taking that seriously, then that should be a reason for releasing a brand new iPhone. Perhaps as soon as June."
It was an almost perfect example of the iOSphere agent provocateur: sweeping generalities wedded to faux business expertise, laced with smug assurance.
"You sound like you're not really interested in a release date but you just want to moan about the 5," charged MonkeySee. "[T]hat's typical armchair expert industry analysis ...," analyzed takeshi74. "We'll see what happens but their track record doesn't support your assertion which is based solely on your own preferences. Keep the day job and leave the analysis to the pros."
"I am a pro. Stop trying to devalue my opinion, just because you don't like it," snapped Ramius.
"I cant see how anyone can say that the 5 isnt a huge change from the 4S, or the 3GS in that manner," wrote kre62. "I think this proves that there is nothing that Apple can do that wont be looked at as a minor upgrade."
"The [iPhone] 6 is going to be a marked departure from previous re-designs and they are going to take a gamble with it in some form or another," promised syd430. "The screen will definitely stay at 4", but we're going to see some major new kind of functionality not seen in other phones. In 2 years time, they won't be able to afford to play it safe anymore. They need to protect their cash cow, and the board [of directors] understands this."
From which we can take two lessons. No one has the faintest idea what the Next iPhone will be. And every one has definite ideas on what the Next iPhone will be.
iPhone 6 or 5S or whatevah will be released in summer or fall of 2013
The best iOSphere rumors cover all the bases, which means you end up back where you started and none the wiser, even though you feel wiser.
"The latest [rumor] has Apple potentially starting production of the [next] iPhone in March or April [2013], sooner than expected, with a release possibly coming in the middle part of next year," recounts Adam Mills at GottaBeMobile. "If true, it would be vastly different than the last two iPhone launches which took place later in the year in September (iPhone 5) and October (iPhone 4S) respectively."
Vastly different. Hugely. Immensely. Because it would be like four or five months earlier than the last two models.
But Mills isn't buying this. Though he can't rule it out. So he is buying it, kind of. But not completely. "While we remain skeptical, a summer release remains a possibility given Apple's earlier releases," he says. Just ask the folks at Mac Rumors about "history."
Why is he skeptical? "The source of the rumors, Digitimes, has an extremely mixed track record when it comes to Apple news, so the iPhone 5S release date at this point is still firmly entrenched in the shadows," he reminds his readers. And yet.
"However, as we pointed out, that doesn't mean that the iPhone 5S won't be released in the summer," he also reminds them. Just because Digitimes may not know anything doesn't mean that it's not wrong about the Next iPhone not being released in fall 2013 ... or not not being released.
As Mills notes, Apple makes decisions. And nobody knows the trouble we've seen trying to figure out what they've decided. "Apple has changed its release months and windows before," he says, drawing on his deep knowledge of history. "Apple makes these changes as it sees fit and that means that the summer window is still open alongside the fall iPhone 5S release window."
It's simple really. iPhone 6 or 5S or whatevah will be released in the fall. Unless it's the summer.
But. "Don't expect the iPhone 5S to arrive in any other release windows besides those though," cautions Mills. "That's because the new iPhone always comes with the new version of iOS and iOS 7 likely won't be announced until WWDC."
Unless, you know, Apple makes a change as it sees fit and throws wide open yet another release window. One that's somewhere between Jan. 1, 2013, and Dec. 31, 2013.
iPhone 6 will be rescued by "design supremo" Jonathan Ive ... and not a moment too soon
Over at the U.K.'s "The Gadget Show," Jason Bradbury and the "gorgeous and obsessed with tech" Pollyanna Woodward are just thrilled that Apple's veteran "design supremo" Jonathan Ive has been placed in charge of all "human interface" stuff at Apple, which includes as they point out both hardware and software.
In the nick of time. Bradbury and Woodward offer him their advice on "Six ways Jony Ive can make iPhone 6 the ultimate phone" and "king of the mobile jungle."
Their recommendations are only slightly marred by the fact that Ive has no responsibility for at least four of them.
The Ultimate Phone needs to have "icons that come alive," like the "love tiles" of Microsoft WindowsPhone 8. Apple has only been making them incrementally livelier.
And Apple needs a "more forward looking design." This apparently means dumping the "skeumorphic" design philosophy evident in some applications, such as adding the appearance of leather and paper to Apple's iCalendar app. "It's meant to make technophobes more comfortable using the device, and not alienate them by looking too 'techy,'" is B&W's rather simplistic summary of skeumorphs. "Which is all well and good. But it's getting a little long in the tooth nowadays and could do with a refresh."
This sounds like, "make it different." Which doesn't quite rise to the level of design insight let alone philosophy.
Both the icons and the look-and-feel of the iOS UI appear to fall into Ive's recently expanded domain. But that's not true of the other recommendations put forth by B&W: "sorting out" the Apple Maps "disaster" (something explicitly assigned to Apple SVP Eddy Cue), wireless charging as Nokia introduced in its Lumia smartphones, near-field communications, and a still-bigger screen.
B&W are baffled by the depth of Apple's dumbness. Instead of "looking to the future" with wireless charging, Apple instead "went the other route with the iPhone 5, introducing a new Lightning connection that renders old accessories and chargers redundant without an adapter," they write. "Apple, it's these kinds of decisions that turn people off," they admonish.
Likewise with NFC: Instead of boldly adding an NFC chip, "Apple has stuck with its own technology, using its Passbook app to let you call up a boarding pass, discount voucher, or loyalty card," they write. "But it's a lot more limited than NFC, which everyone else has adopted." Well, not quite everyone: NFC based payments are projected to be still only a fraction of plastic and cash payments for years to come.
And iPhone 5's 4-inch screen is welcome but another of those too little too late decisions. "If the iPhone 6 isn't larger than 4-inches, it's going to look pretty puny compared to the big boys [from Samsung and other rivals]," B&W declare.
Snap to it, Mr. Ive.
John Cox covers wireless networking and mobile computing for Network World. Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnwcoxnww Email: john_cox@nww.com
Read more about anti-malware in Network World's Anti-malware section.




The Future of the Mac: Networking


The next two years promise much faster short-range and medium-range wired and wireless networking, and zippier mobile connections.
What's the point of these increasing speeds, when today's networking gear already feels reasonably fast? Video, primarily. The name of the game is streaming or downloading high-definition video--across a room or from one end of the house to the other--while still leaving enough room on the network for other activities such as file downloads, Facebook, and email.
Connecting devices
Back when Thunderbolt technology was still under development, Intel (its main mover) said that optical cabling would enable multiple-gigabits-per-second connections to displays, peripherals, and networks, and would permit cords to run as far as 30 meters. Things didn't quite pan out that way.
Apparently optical cabling was hard to produce and expensive, so Apple and Intel switched to copper wiring instead. That wiring still supported the Thunderbolt spec's two channels of simultaneous bidirectional ("full duplex") 10-gbps data. But it didn't allow for those long cables; instead, connections could be no more than about 10 feet (3 meters). Using wire also necessitated the addition of chips to the cables, to handle signaling and to ensure backward compatibility with DisplayPort. The one upside: Thunderbolt cords can pass up to 10 watts per device, more than double USB 3.0's capacity.
In the future, when compatibility with older connection standards becomes less important, Thunderbolt will likely return to optical cables. Those cables will allow for 30-meter runs. And the intelligence could move from the cables into computers and mobile devices, making Thunderbolt cables cheaper. On the flip side, the cables will likely be able to deliver just 4.5 watts or so per device. My guess is that an optical update to Thunderbolt could arrive in Apple hardware within two years--but rather than replacing current Thunderbolt ports, it would have to come in the form of a new port on Apple's pro models.
In the meantime, USB 3.0 has found its way into all new Mac models (except the Mac Pro). At 5 gbps, USB 3.0 is not exactly slow, and compatible hardware is widely available. It meets many of the needs that Thunderbolt fills, except for standard support of external displays. I predict that the scarcity and high costs of Thunderbolt-compatible hardware will keep USB 3.0 as the preferred choice for people who don't need the highest possible performance.
While gigabit ethernet is available in all Mac gear with ethernet ports (except the AirPort Express and Apple TV, which top out at 100 mbps), the 10-gbps flavor of ethernet seems unlikely to come to Apple hardware anytime soon. That's largely due to the cost of adapters and switches. Thunderbolt may be the solution. Apple already offers a Thunderbolt-to-gigabit-ethernet adapter, and the company could conceivably sell a 10-gbps adapter as that market matures. But outside of server rooms and data centers, gigabit ethernet will probably remain the default choice.
Through the ether
The 802.11n flavor of Wi-Fi has become the default in all Apple devices that have wireless capabilities. Newer 802.11n devices (including the iPhone 5) boost wireless speeds by supporting both the 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequency bands. But wireless networking will soon get even more of a boost thanks to the advent of two new wireless technologies: 802.11ac (which is an update to 802.11n) and 802.11ad (for in-room superhigh-speed streaming).
The 802.11ac update, already shipping in some equipment from several vendors even though the standard is not yet finalized, can boost wireless networking speed to a raw rate of over 1 gbps, but only in particular cases. While 802.11n tops out at a raw data rate of 450 mbps in Apple equipment and similar networking gear, comparable 802.11ac base stations will have a minimum top rate of 867 mbps.
Since 802.11ac works only in the 5GHz band, 802.11n will remain the standard for communicating in the crowded 2.4GHz band. In addition, much of 802.11ac's performance improvements will be realized only in particular circumstances or when you're using advanced hardware; for that reason, the greatest boosts in speeds won't be apparent in consumer networking, but rather in enterprises, on academic campuses, and perhaps at large-scale hotspots such as airports and convention centers.
Despite those limitations, Apple could add a preliminary version of 802.11ac to its base stations as soon as the next major refresh of the product line, and that typically happens in February or October. Adding 802.11ac to mobile devices might not enhance their speed much, but it would improve efficiency: A base station with that standard built in can simultaneously and separately communicate with multiple simpler 802.11ac devices (those that can't send multiple data streams at once) instead of interacting round-robin among them.
Although 802.11ac will eventually become part of the certified Wi-Fi spec, the 802.11ad standard is something else altogether. It offers four channels, over each of which data can race at rates up to 7 gbps. But such speeds are available only over distances of no more than about 30 feet. That's because 802.11ad uses the 60GHz band to transmit data, and signals at those frequencies can't penetrate objects well. It's certain to be restricted to applications in which the networked devices are in line of sight (or reflection) of each other.
For that reason, 802.11ad's primary uses will be for rapid transfer of large files--such as sending a movie file from a computer to a set-top box--or for streaming uncompressed high-definition video. Normally, high-definition video is stored in compressed form on hard drives, DVDs, or Blu-ray; when you stream video over the Internet, it travels in compressed form, too. Once your device receives the compressed data, it decompresses the data for playback. Repeated compression and decompression can compromise video quality. If you can send video uncompressed--which 802.11ad enables--you can watch it at the highest possible quality.
The ideal convergence will be base stations and adapters that incorporate 802.11n for 2.4GHz and 5GHz, 802.11ac for 5GHz, and 802.11ad for 60GHz, switching as necessary to the best medium for the task or the reception quality. Some chipmakers have already announced plans to make sets of chips for just that purpose--but you shouldn't expect to see 802.11ad in shipping hardware any earlier than 2014.
Faster mobility
LTE (Long Term Evolution), a mobile broadband standard that cellular operators are rapidly deploying around the world, is all the rage right now. AT&T, Sprint Nextel, and Verizon Wireless have LTE installed in a reasonable percentage of the United States already, and by 2013 all three companies expect that most or all of the areas where they currently offer cellular data will also have LTE.
But the kind of LTE that carriers have put in place so far is more of a low-speed version of the spec. When LTE was first being devised as a thorough overhaul to the evolutionary approach of GSM-derived 3G and 4G networks a few years ago, the developers knew that an even faster version would be possible. That version, now called LTE Advanced, calls for speeds up to 3 gbps with fixed devices and hundreds of megabits per second for in-motion receivers traveling rapidly, as in cars and trains.
Like LTE, LTE Advanced can make use of frequency channels of many different widths, in contrast to the hard limits of 3G and 4G networking technology. LTE Advanced goes even further, and can allow aggregating channels that are spread out, as opposed to continuous frequencies, making it possible for a carrier to assemble bandwidth at lower cost.
LTE and LTE Advanced have essentially won the mobile-standards battle worldwide for cellular networks, too, so any advances we see will come from this technology.
Apple buyers shouldn't hold their collective breath for LTE Advanced, however. Carriers have to acquire more bandwidth to make it truly useful, and in many cases are already paying billions to install the existing LTE technology flavor. Reports indicate a target of 2014 and beyond for any substantial upgrades and availability in handsets and other receivers.


Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Oracle takes stake in PaaS vendor Engine Yard


Oracle has taken a minority stake in Engine Yard, maker of a PaaS (platform as a service) for Ruby, PHP and Node.js applications, the company announced Tuesday. Financial terms were not disclosed.
Oracle and Engine Yard "are expected to connect their respective PaaS offerings to enable more rapid development of applications in a secure, reliable and scalable environment," according to a statement.
Engine Yard will remain an independent company, Oracle said.
Oracle's move is meant to give users of its recently announced Oracle Cloud PaaS, which offers the ability to write and deploy Java EE-based applications, more development options, particularly for Web applications rather than heavier-duty enterprise applications for which Java EE is often used.
The move is good for Engine Yard and its customers, CEO John Dillon said in a blog post on Tuesday.
"This is a great day for our organization and for our customers," he wrote. "The resulting partnership with Oracle will give Engine Yard access to new technologies and allow us to increase the technical investment we make in our products."
Oracle may also have been interested in investing in Engine Yard because of its broad partner ecosystem. Engine Yard customers can tap a wide variety of "Add-On" platform services from partners, such as application monitoring, continuous integration and recurring billing.
It wasn't immediately clear Tuesday when the integration between Oracle's PaaS and Engine Yard would be completed, nor whether Oracle may some day seek to acquire Engine Yard.
While Oracle is well-known for its long run of acquisitions, it has also taken partial stakes in companies before, such as its 2010 investment in Infiniband vendor Mellanox.
Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris' email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Report: Intel in talks to invest up to US$500 million in Sharp


Intel is in final negotiations to invest up to US$500 million in struggling Sharp of Japan, Kyodo News agency reported Tuesday.
Japan's largest news agency said the companies were discussing an investment of between ¥30 billion and ¥40 billion. It reported Sharp is also negotiating with Qualcomm, the U.S. maker of chips and components for mobile devices.
Sharp, in the midst of a restructuring and facing $5.6 billion in losses this fiscal year, warned earlier this month that it may not survive if it can't turn around its business or secure outside investment. While the company has massive cash flow problems and has been assigned junk status by rating agencies, it still possesses cutting-edge LCD technologies and some of the largest display factories in the world.
The Osaka-based company is in ongoing negotiations with Foxconn parent Hon Hai, after an investment deal agreed to earlier this year was shelved when Sharp's stock price plunged. While Sharp's negotiating position weakens along with its financial situation and sagging stock price, adding more bidders to the mix could motivate potential investors.
Sharp is suffering from investing too much on large-screen LCD panels for TVs, and is rushing to switch over to making screens for the booming tablet and smartphone market. The company also makes its own phones and tablets, which it sells mainly in Japan, and a wide range of consumer electronics and appliances.
The company has begun mass producing small screens for mobile devices using its IGZO technology, which uses far less power than existing technologies. Named after the indium gallium zinc oxide semiconductor on which they are based, the screens will be used in several upcoming Sharp devices, and the company has said it expects them to become a core product.
Officials at Sharp were not available for comment late Tuesday in Japan. The latest report from Kyodo, however, comes two months after Sharp denied earlier articles that it was in talks with Intel, saying flatly "there is no truth to the reports."
"It is pure speculation, we don't comment on rumors," said Chuck Mulloy, an Intel spokesman.
Japanese media have also linked Sharp to deep-pocketed Apple, for which it is a major supplier of displays.

Extreme joins Cisco, Brocade, Huawei at 100G


Extreme Networks this week unveiled 100G and 40G Ethernet modules as well as SDN application support for its BlackDiamond X8 core switch.
Extreme's 100/40G XL modules are designed to help scale BlackDiamond X8 networks for virtualized multi-tenant cloud data centers, Internet Exchanges and data center core deployments. They are capable of scaling to 1 million route entries, and hundreds of thousands of addresses and flows through an upgraded TCAM, and logically segment multi-tenant networks with Layer 2 broadcast domains, Extreme says.
Extreme says they are "ideally suited" for evolving data center interconnect architectures with hardware Layer 2 over Generic Routing Encapsulation (L2GRE), and VXLAN transport with several tens of thousands of multicast groups.
Extreme joins CiscoBrocade and Huawei as suppliers of 100G Ethernet for data centers. Juniper and Alcatel-Lucent, as well as Cisco and Brocade, provide it for service provider core and edge routing.
The four-port 100G module supports non-blocking, wire-speed performance of Layer 2/3 services, support of 100G-SR -- 100meter -- and 100G-OR 10Km optics, and fault tolerance and redundancy with N+1 power support. The 40G modules sports 12 wire-speed QSFP+ ports.
They allow the BlackDiamond X8 to scale to 32 100G ports and 98 40G ports. Extreme also has a 24-port 40G module that enables the switch to scale to 768 10G and 192 40G ports.
Separately, Extreme says it is supports OpenFlow startup Big Switch Networks' SDN applications for network virtualization and visibility. Extreme says its ExtremeXOS switch operating system can support Big Switch's Big Tap applications for traffic monitoring and network visibility with flow filtering; and Big Virtual Switch application for network virtualization.
Customer trials of the 12-port 40G and 4-port 100G XL modules begin next year, Extreme says. The 40G module costs $6,000 per port and the 100G module costs $35,000 per port.
Jim Duffy has been covering technology for over 25 years, 21 at Network World. He also writes The Cisco Connection blog and can be reached on Twitter @Jim_Duffy.
Read more about lan and wan in Network World's LAN & WAN section.

SugarSync 2.0 is a complete facelift of content-sharing service


SugarSync today released the public beta of a complete revamp of its cloud storage and content-sharing service that replaces its file directory-style look with a GUI-style menu along with drag and drop file transfer features.
SugarSync 2.0 also offers new search functionality that will initially allow users to search by file name and later by file content.
"That was the top requested feature by users: search," said SugarSync spokesman Robb Henshaw. "It's like having Google Desktop or Spotlight Search on your computer."
The previous SugarSync version used the user's native file directory for searches, but that didn't work well with mobile devices, Henshaw said.
Henshaw called the new user interface "very DropBoxesque" but with more powerful features. Henshaw was referring to DropBox, another cloud storage service.
A before and after look at SugarSync's user interface
SugarSync also added drag-and-drop sharing of content to contacts or to social media sites, giving users a faster method of sharing and collaborating.
"You can share by dropping the target file into a list of contacts' email addresses, or you can just drop a file to one specific email address on a list," Henshaw said.
The Sharing Tab displays what's being shared with you by others, and a second tab shows what you're sharing with everyone else. Another feature allows users to select when they want to break the file-sharing link with another user or users.
SugarSync 2.0 also introduced the new "SugarSync Drive," a virtual drive that displays all content synchronized to SugarSync's cloud storage service. The SugarSync Drive allows users to see all of their folders in the cloud from any device, and allows users to manage that content from their system's native file system.
Previously users had what SugarSync called its Magic Briefcase, a proprietary user interface. Customers can continue using the Magic Briefcase if they're more comfortable with that, or the new SugarSync Drive. New users will only be offered the SugarSync Drive cloud management feature.
Files and folders stored in SugerSync Drive display to users on which device they were originally stored as well as on what other devices the content has been synchronized.
When a user scrolls down a file directory, a green check mark will appear if it is stored locally.
"With the new version, you can keep a local copy on one device so that you can work on the file when you're offline, and pull down another copy from the cloud on all your other devices [when you're online]," Henshaw said. "Or you can just have one copy in the cloud, and no copies on any device."
A new "activity tab" also displays everything a user has been doing in the cloud. "So if you're wondering if that folder or photos got uploaded, it will display that. It shows you information by day and time," Henshaw added. "We will also let you know when files were changed and by whom. This shows you who's accessed a file you shared and who has downloaded it. It's a good collaboration tool."
The new beta of SugarSync 2.0 desktop, Web and Android apps are available for download now on SugarSync's site.
Lucas Mearian covers storage, disaster recovery and business continuity, financial services infrastructure and health care IT for Computerworld. Follow Lucas on Twitter at @lucasmearian or subscribe to Lucas's RSS feed. His e-mail address is lmearian@computerworld.com.
Read more about cloud storage in Computerworld's Cloud Storage Topic Center.

How to restore data from Time Machine in Mountain Lion


Now that you've been using Time Machine regularly to back up your computer, you should be fully prepared if your Mac crashes or if you need to move data from one Mac to another. Restoring data from Time Machine is just as easy as backing things up in the first place.
Restore a single file or folder
If you're just looking for a certain file or folder, start by connecting the external drive you use for Time Machine backups or making sure you can connect to your Time Capsule. Click on the Time Machine item in the menu bar at the top of your screen (it looks like a clock with an arrow running counter-clockwise) and choose Enter Time Machine. Here, all of your saved backups appear in chronological order. Use the visual timeline on the right hand side to scroll through your backups and look for specific items or folders. Older dates are indicated in pink on the timeline; the most up-to-date data on your Mac is indicated in white. (You'll see the word "Now" in bold, white letters on the timeline.)
Not sure which backup might hold the last copy of your missing file? Try a Spotlight search in Time Machine based on keywords. You'll see a search field in the corner of each Finder window in the Time Machine view. Type in the file name or keywords from the file, and Spotlight will search through your backups to find the latest copy.
Once you think you've found what you're looking for, use OS X's Quick Look to make sure--select the file and then press the spacebar to view the file without having to launch its parent application.
Select the file or folder and press the Restore button. The file will automatically be copied to your desktop or to the file's original folder. This may take some time, depending on the size of the transfer.
Restore an entire system
Sometimes you may want to restore your entire system from a backup, say in event of a crash or when your computer is acting badly and you'd like to dial back the clock to a kinder, gentler time. If that's the case, first connect your Time Machine drive. Then, start up your Mac from the Mountain Lion recovery partition by pressing (and holding down) Command-R at startup. This launches Recovery Mode, which is a portion of your drive that Mountain Lion treats as a separate volume. It includes a few essential utilities for restoring files in case of an issue. For this to work, you must have a complete Time Machine backup that includes all system files.
The Mac OS X Utilities window appears. Select Restore From Time Machine Backup. This command will erase the destination drive--your Mac--so only use it if you're restoring an entire volume to its original source or to a replacement drive. (Read the next section for setting up a new Mac or transferring data between Macs).
Click Continue until you reach the Select a Backup Source window. Select your Time Machine drive and click Continue. In the Select a Destination window, select your Mac's hard drive. (Using Recovery Modeerases your Mac's hard drive before restoring from Time Machine, but once the process is finished, you'll be able to log in and use your Mac normally).
Transfer data between Macs
Let's say you bought a new Mac and want to transfer all the data from your old system to it. Or, say you simply want to transfer data from one Mac to another. Time Machine can help here too, but with the assistance of another built-in Mountain Lion utility called Migration Assistant.
Once your backup drive is connected, launch Migration Assistant (in your /Applications/Utilities folder). A Migration Assistant window will appear and ask how you want to transfer your information. Choose the From another Mac, PC, Time Machine backup, or other disk option and then click Continue. You may be prompted to enter your administrator's password. Do so, if necessary, and click Continue.
Next, you'll be asked to quit other applications. Do so, and click Continue. In the next window, select the From a Time Machine backup or other disk option and click Continue.
Select your backup drive and enter a password for it, if necessary. Then, choose which items you'd like to migrate (chances are, this will be everything). Click Continue, and your files will begin to transfer. For more tips about using Migration Assistant, see "Move data from an old Mac to a new Mac."

WD releases Mac desktop drives with USB 3.0, 4TB capacity


Western Digital today introduced a new version of its My Book Studio desktop drive for Mac OS X systems that offers USB 3.0 connectivity and as much as 4TB of storage capacity in a single drive.
Drives with USB 3.0, also known as Super-Speed USB connectivity, are coming out in droves even as computer systems with 480Mbps USB 2.0, called Hi-Speed USB connectivity, cannot take advantage of the additional I/O bandwidth.
The My Book Studio drives come pre-formatted for Mac OS X, but users can reformat them for use with Windows systems and the file allocation table (FAT) file system.
In August, WD released the My Book VelociRaptor Duo desktop backup drive with 10Gbps Thunderbolt I/O connectivity and the My Passport for Mac with USB 3.0.
WD touted the VelociRaptor Duo, with 2TB capacity, as king of the heap for performance. The performance of the VelociRaptor Duo is at least as good as any consumer SSD, WD said.
WD could not say when the My Book Studio will have Thunderbolt capability. WD's new My Book Studio desktop drive comes in 1TB, 2TB, 3TB and 4TB of capacity. The drive is compatible with Apple Time Machine and offers 256-bit hardware-based encryption for added security against unauthorized access to the drive and its contents.
"WD's My Book Studio with USB 3.0 delivers extreme transfer speeds while maintaining the standard USB and FireWire connections computer users prefer," said Jim Welsh, executive vice president and general manager of WD's branded and CE products. "Its large capacity, combined with a premium aluminum enclosure, hardware-based encryption, and compatibility with Apple Time Machine, provide Mac users with a fast, secure and complete system for preserving their valuable content."
WD continues to offer its My Book Studio drive with USB 2.0 and FireWire800 connectivity for legacy systems.
The My Book Studio external hard drive comes with a 3-year limited warranty and has a suggest retail price of $160 for the 1TB; $190 for 2TB; $240 for 3TB and $300 for 4TB version.
Lucas Mearian covers storage, disaster recovery and business continuity, financial services infrastructure and health care IT for Computerworld. Follow Lucas on Twitter at @lucasmearian or subscribe to Lucas's RSS feed. His e-mail address is lmearian@computerworld.com.
Read more about data storage in Computerworld's Data Storage Topic Center.

Internet Explorer 10 Preview available for Windows 7 users


Although Windows 8 users have been enjoying IE10 since the new OS launched, this is the first time Windows 7 users can give the new browser a try.
For Windows 7 users, Internet Explorer 10 won't be a major upgrade over IE9. Microsoft mainly focused on Windows 8 for this version, building a new Modern-style interface with optimizations for touch and support for Windows 8 features, such as sharing and search from the Charms bar and Start screen app pinning. Aesthetically, the desktop version of IE10 looks nearly identical to IE9.
Still, there are a few reasons to check out Internet Explorer 10 on Windows 7 devices. Let's take a look at the main new features.
Flip ahead
Internet Explorer 10 can detect when an article on the Web has multiple pages, and offers a "Flip Ahead" function to turn to the next page. It's useful if you're reading through an article and can't find the "next page" button on the website; just hit the "Forward" button in IE10's navigation bar to flip the page. This feature is disabled by default because it sends your browsing history to Microsoft. To enable it, go to Internet Properties > Advanced > Browsing and check "Enable Flip Ahead."
Security enhancements
Microsoft says Internet Explorer10 builds on the security features of its predecessor, with improvements such as full support for HTML5 Sandbox technology.
The main new feature, however, is an optional " Enhanced Protected Mode," which locks down parts of the operating system that the browser typically doesn't need to access. For instance, with this mode enabled, the browser can't access your Documents folder unless you're performing a specific action, such as choosing a file through Explorer dialog. The idea is to keep documents safe even if an attacker has exploited a vulnerability in the browser or an add-on. This feature can be enabled through Internet Options > Advanced > "Enabled Enhanced Protected Mode."
Default Do Not Track
Do Not Track is enabled by default in Internet Explorer 10. This setting asks websites not to track the user's browsing behavior for the purpose of serving targeted ads, but it's still up to those sites to actually comply with the request. Microsoft's decision to enable Do Not Track has caused a controversy, since advertisers believe users should have to opt out of tracking. As a result, some companies have said they'll ignore Internet Explorer 10's Do Not Track settings .
Under-the-hood improvements
Internet Explorer 10 is largely about performance improvements rather than big features. The browser has support for more standards-based features, such as 3D transforms, transitions and animations in CSS, and HTML5 spell-checking. Microsoft has also worked on improving JavaScript performance. Lately Microsoft has shown off its browser's performance chops with Web-based games like Atari Arcade and Contre Jour (though, to be fair, the games work well in other browsers).
To download the preview of Internet Explorer 9, head to Microsoft's website.